Unbelievable!!! They are more worried about lining there pockets instead of doing what is right for the children and the people who are already compromised. I agree with the la chevalier vit. Well said!!! Please keep sending and informing us on the illigimate vaccines. We need to safe our children and their future.
Disheartening: “ - Cole on plans to approve vaccine for toddlers: “They're not going to not approve [emergency use authorization for children five years old or less].” “
Unconscionable: “ Cole, who claims his role with the FDA is to ensure the agency uses a framework of safety, security, and effectiveness as a part of its preparedness and response protocol, specifically cited concerns over “long term effects, especially with someone younger.” “
Very odd that a person who claims their role is to ensure process/frameworks to achieve safety (and efficacy) (a) would cite concerns - I mean that’s his job to prevent the concerns??? - and (b) would not be a stakeholder with a say in the approval (i.e. to speak to whether the process/framework was followed).
Exactly to everything you said. And I really don't want to lose hope about the under 5's, so hearing him confirm what I fear most is indeed disheartening.
Yes. :-( However I won’t be discouraged from another round of letter writing when the time comes, for the children who cannot speak for themselves, for our souls, and for Frodo!
Unbelievable!!! They are more worried about lining there pockets instead of doing what is right for the children and the people who are already compromised. I agree with the la chevalier vit. Well said!!! Please keep sending and informing us on the illigimate vaccines. We need to safe our children and their future.
Thank you so much for sharing this.
Disheartening: “ - Cole on plans to approve vaccine for toddlers: “They're not going to not approve [emergency use authorization for children five years old or less].” “
Unconscionable: “ Cole, who claims his role with the FDA is to ensure the agency uses a framework of safety, security, and effectiveness as a part of its preparedness and response protocol, specifically cited concerns over “long term effects, especially with someone younger.” “
Very odd that a person who claims their role is to ensure process/frameworks to achieve safety (and efficacy) (a) would cite concerns - I mean that’s his job to prevent the concerns??? - and (b) would not be a stakeholder with a say in the approval (i.e. to speak to whether the process/framework was followed).
ugh
Exactly to everything you said. And I really don't want to lose hope about the under 5's, so hearing him confirm what I fear most is indeed disheartening.
Yes. :-( However I won’t be discouraged from another round of letter writing when the time comes, for the children who cannot speak for themselves, for our souls, and for Frodo!
(oops a little humor slipped out)
do they even hear themselves speaking
The dissociation is really something. And as an aside, why isn't this plastered everywhere? Why isn't this front page news?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-executive-officer-says-us-government-plans-to-push-annual-covid-19-shots_4282659.html
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/16/fda-exec-coronavirus-vaccines-not-been-as-effective-as-expected/
Sadly, I think we know why. It should be, agreed. If it were, I feel it would present quite a challenging cognitive dissonance to many.